Narendra S/O Wasudeo Pundkar v. State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Gadgenagar Amravati Dist.Amravati And Another

1 apl 100.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Criminal Application (APL) No.

of 20 [Narendra s/o Wasudeo Pundkar ..vs.. State of Maharashtra through P.S.O., P. S., Gadgenagar, Amravati and anr.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. T. A. Mirza, APP for the State/non-applicant 1 CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO AND ANIL L. PANSARE J J .

DATED : 14 - 9None appears on behalf of the applicant.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the applicant on 6-9-2022 and we recorded that since the applicant is consistently absent, costs will have to be imposed. 3.

While the office note is that the costs are paid, again the learned counsel for the applicant is absent. 4.

The application is dismissed with costs of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand).

5.

If any application for restoration is preferred, the Registry shall ensure that the direction to pay costs is duly complied with.

(Anil L. Pansare, J.) (Rohit B. Deo, J.) YUVRAJ WASNIK wasnik