← Library
Bombay High CourtCAZ/66/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Smt. Nalini W/O Birendrakumar Shrivastav v. Western Coal Fields Ltd. Thr. Its Sub Area Manager, And Another

2015-10-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.N. Deshmukh2 pages

caz66.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

Civil Application (CAZ) No. 66 of 2015 in L.P.A. No. 8 of 2015 (D) in Writ Petition No. 2253 of 2002 (D) (Smt. Nalini W/o Birendra Kumar Shrivastava Vs. W.C.L. through its Sub-Area Manager, Sillewara, Tal. Saoner, Distt. Nagpur and anr.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P. N. DESHUKH, JJ.

DATE : 28-10-2015.

Heard Shri R. N. Sen, learned counsel for the applicant. He submits that the applicant is ultimately held not entitled to gratuity amount which she has already withdrawn. He therefore states that if surety furnished by the applicant is discharged, the amount received by her can be refunded. He further adds that she is entitled to arrears in terms of National Coal Wage Agreement (NCWA)-VI. If that amount is adjusted against amount to be refunded, the burden of the applicant may be reduced or wiped

caz66.15 out.

The application has been filed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 8/2015 which is already decided. Letters patent appeal arose in Writ Petition No. 2253/2002 filed by her employer.

It is, therefore, apparent that grievance of this nature cannot be looked into in present application. Shri Sen, however, invited our attention to the order dated 14-8-2015 passed by the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Office of the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner at Nagpur and submits that this order is totally arbitrary.

With liberty to the applicant to take such other remedies as are open in law to assail that order and keeping all rival contentions open, we dispose the civil application.

No order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE wasnik