← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/2021/2018admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Punyashlok Ahilyadevi Shikshan Sanstha Thr Its Vice President Shri D J Sao v. Rajesh S/O Balkrushna Padole And ORS

2018-08-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre1 pages

wp.6218.12 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application [CAW] No.2021 of 2018 in Writ Petition No.6218 of 2012 Punyashlok Ahilyadevi Shikshan Sanstha, Mansar vs.

Rajesh Balkrushna Padole & others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- OfÏce notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri Saurabh Chaudhari, Advocate for the Applicant-Petitioner. Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms. Ritu Kalia, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.4 & 5.

CORAM

: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 27 th AUGUST, 2018.

Heard.

This application seeks to amend the pleadings by making a reference to the subsequent developments.

The learned Counsel for respondent No.1 has no objection. The learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos.4 & 5 also does not have any objection.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.

Amendment be carried out within two weeks from the date of the order.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE *sandesh