Bombay High CourtCAW/2036/2015admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Dhananjay Maniklal Vishwakarma v. Miss. Urmila D/O Sunderlal Vishwakarma And Others

2015-10-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp2922.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W. NOS.2035/2015, 2036/2015 & 2037/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2922/2014 Dhananjay Maniklal Vishwakarma ..Versus..

Miss. Urmila d/o Sunderlal Vishwakarma and others Applicants : Madhuri wd/o Dhananjai Vishwakarma and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.S. Sharma, Adv. for the petitioner.

Shri B.N. Mohta, Adv. for respondents 3 to 5 and 8. CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 7.10.2015 For the reasons stated in the applications, delay in filing the application for bringing the legal representatives of petitioner on the record is condoned, the abatement is set aside and the applicants are permitted to get themselves impleaded as petitioners 1-A to 1-C. The civil applications are allowed accordingly.

JUDGE Tambaskar.