Bombay High CourtWP/5624/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

M/S Goldbricks Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Raipur Thr. Authorized Representative Rajesh S. Saraogi v. Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Through Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur And Another

2016-12-09Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi3 pages

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5624/2016 (M/S GOLDBRICKS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., RAIPUR VERSUS N.M.C., NAGPUR & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.P. Dharmadhikari, Senior Counsel with Shri Shyam Dewani, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri A.M. Quazi, counsel for the R-1 & 2.

Shri A.S. Fulzele, Additional G.P. for the R-3. Shri S.S. Sanyal, counsel for the R-4.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 9 , 2016.

Shri Dharmadhikari, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, states that though more than a couple of prayers are made in the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner would stand redressed if this Court grants the alternate prayer made in Prayer Clause (a) and directs the respondents to decide the final layout plan and revised building plan submitted by the petitioner-Company within a time frame.

Since the prayer made by the petitioner-Company is innocuous, the same needs to be granted.

Shri Quazi, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2, states that at least sixty days time would be required for a decision on the final layout plan and then the building plan would be considered.

In view of the statements made by the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent nos.1 and 2 to take a decision on the final layout plan and revised building plan submitted by the petitioner-Company within ninety days.

Order accordingly. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE