← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/790/2016allowed

Shiv Ajabrao Daldale (In Jail) v. The State Of Maharashtra, P.S.O. Wadgaon Road, P.S. Yavatmal

2016-09-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre3 pages

ba.790.16 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [BA] No.790 of 2016 (Shiv Ajabrao Daldale vs.

State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Wadgaon Raod, Yavatmal) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri Anand Deshpande, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S.J. Kadu, A.P.P. for the Non-Applicant /State.

CORAM

: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 29 th SEPTEMBER, 2016.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

Reply filed by the prosecution is taken on record. It appears that the major part of investigation is already over. So the question of custodial interrogation of the applicant at this stage would not arise. It is true that previously two crimes have been registered against this applicant, which relate to dishonestly receiving stolen property under Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. But, the question is for how long, the applicant can be kept in jail on an apprehension that if released on bail, he may commit similar offences, and the answer would have to be found out by making a reference to the maximum punishment prescribed for the offence of theft punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code which is of only three years, out of which in the present crime the applicant has spent

ba.790.16 2 a period of about 11⁄2 months or so. It is also not known as to when the trial against this applicant would be completed in the scenario, where several other cases are pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate. In this particular case, two co-accused of this applicant are absconding. In such a situation, I am of the view that it would not be in the interest of justice to keep the applicant in jail for any longer period. Hence, the order. The application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- together with one solvent surety in the like sum on the conditions that he shall attend the court proceedings regularly on the dates fixed in the matter, shall co-operate with the trial Court in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

The application is disposed of in these terms. *sdw JUDGE

ba.790.16 3 C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of the original signed order.

Uploaded by: S.D. Waghmare Uploaded on : 30/09/2016 P.A. to the Hon'ble Judge.