Bombay High CourtCAW/1921/2017ca disposed off

Bhartiya Kanya Vidyalaya Thr. Head Mistress, Amravati v. Satish Purushottam Kolhatkar, Amravti

2017-08-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte2 pages

1 caw1921.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.1921 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4821 OF 2008 (BHARTIYA KANYA VIDYALAYA...VS..SATISH P. KOLHATKAR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.S. Patil, Advocate for Petitioner.

Shri Anoop Gilda, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms M.A. Barabde, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J.

DATED : AUGUST 24, 2017.

This civil application is taken out for stay of the impugned order enhancing the rent from Rs.9,795/- to Rs.16,325/-. The stay granted earlier by this Court has been vacated. There is, in the premises, no question of granting any stay of the impugned order.

Learned counsel for the applicant, however, states that his client shall deposit the entire arrears in accordance with the impugned order within a period of four weeks. He states that his petition may be treated as dismissed without any further recourse to this Court in the event his client is unable to deposit the amount of arrears.

The civil application is disposed of in these terms.

2 caw1921.17 In the meantime, in view of the assurance given to the Court and which is accepted by this Court, the possession warrant shall not be executed on the applicant for a period of four weeks.

JUDGE RRaut..