← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5312/2014dismissedrule discharged

Raju S/O Hiraman Lanjewar v. The State Of Maharashtra, Department Of Law And Judiciary Mumbai Thr. Principal Secretary And Other

2015-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Mridula R. Bhatkar1 pages

WPs4693&5312-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4693/2014 (NINA LAXMINARAYAN DUBEY VERSUS MINISTRY OF LAW & JUDICIARY, MUMBAI & OTHERS) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5312/2014 (RAJU HIRAMAN LANJEWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, counsel for the petitioner in WP 4693/2014. Shri V.R. Borkar, counsel for the petitioner in WP 5312/2014. Shri D.P. Thakre, Additional G.P. for the R-1 to 3. Shri H. Marathe h/f Shri A. Parchure for R-6 in WP 4693/2014 and for R-5 in WP 5312/2014.

Shri A.M. Quazi, counsel for the R-7 in WP 4693/2014. Shri B.M. Kharkate for R-8 in WP 4693/2014 and for R-7 in WP 5312/2014.

CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 26 , 2015.

As per the order dated 05.02.2015, we had called for the report of the learned Principal District Judge, Gondia. We had also requested the learned Principal District Judge, Gondia to consult the other learned District Judges. We had stated that the report would be confidential and only be perused by the Court.

We have perused the report. It is directed that the report be sealed in the envelope again. Upon perusal of the report, we find that there is no merit in the petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE