Bombay High CourtWP/5221/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Bishop Cotton Primary School, Nagpur Through Its Head Mistress v. Nitin Padmakar Ghodke And 2 Others

2016-04-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre2 pages

1304wp5221.14 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 5221 of 2014 Bishop Cotton Primary School vs.

Nitin Padmakar Ghodke & ors.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. Kavimandan h/f Mr. R.T. Anthony Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Ghate Advocate for respondent no.1.

Mr. P.A. Raulkar Advocate for respondent no. 2. Mr. Shyam Ahirkar, AGP, for respondent no. 3. ....

CORAM

: S. B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : APRIL 13, 2016.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent no. 1 and respondent no. 2. Learned counsel states that respondent no. 2 has no role to play in this case as the petitioner/school is on permanent no grant basis. Learned AGP states that appropriate orders may be passed. It is seen from the compromise pursis St.No. 10519/15 dated 22.9.2015 that the issue has been amicably settled between the petitioner and respondent no. 1. The petitioner has decided to give fresh appointment to respondent no. 1 in one of the schools as accountant with effect from 21.9.2015 and the respondent no. 1 has submitted an undertaking as mentioned in paragraphs 3 and

1304wp5221.14 2/2 4 of the compromise pursis, which is duly signed by the petitioner and respondent no. 1 and the correctness of the contents is affirmed by learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent no. 1. This being the position, the petition deserves to be disposed of as settled out of Court in terms of compromise pursis.

Writ petition is disposed of as amicably settled out of Court between the petitioner and respondent no. 1 in terms of compromise pursis St. No. 10519/15, which shall be duly complied with by the petitioner and respondent no. 1. No costs.

JUDGE /TA/