Pma Construction Co., Nagpur v. Union Of India Ministry Of Road Transport And High Way, Thr.Chief Engineer And Reg. Officer And ORS

2023:BHC-NAG:13332-DB 1 8.wp.5619.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.

5619/2023 PMA Construction Co. A Partnership Firm Vs. Union of India and Ors. ................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order or directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Mr. R. P. Masurkar, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. N.S.Deshpande, Deputy Solicitor General of India for Respondent No.1. Mr. A. A. Madiwlae, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No. 2. Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM :

A.S.CHANDURKAR AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,JJ.. DATED :

07.09.2023 .

Considering the limited prayer made in the Writ Petition, notice is issued to respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4. Service on respondent No.3 is dispensed with. 2.

Mr. N. S. Deshpande, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India waives service of notice for respondent No.1. Mr. A. A. Madiwale, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice for respondent No. 2 and Mr. Anand Parchure, learned Counsel waives service of notice for respondent No.4.

3.

Pursuant to the order passed in the Writ Petition No.1606/2023 joint measurement has been carried out by the respondent No.4 along with the petitioner. The Joint Measurement Report has accordingly been prepared on 28.07.2023. According to the petitioner, there are certain technical and arithmetical errors in the said Joint Measurement Report. The petitioner has made representation in that regard to the respondent No.4 on 24.08.2023.

2 8.wp.5619.23.odt 4.

In these facts, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No. 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.08.2023. If the respondent No.4 finds that there are any arithmetical and technical errors in the said report, the respondent No.4 can proceed to correct the same in accordance with its procedure.

5.

With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

(MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.) RGurnule