Bombay High CourtWP/6536/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Ravindra S/O Govindrao Shahare v. The Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur And Others

2016-12-09Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi2 pages

0912wp6536.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6536/2016 Ravindra s/o Govindrao Shahare ...Versus...

The Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.S. Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioner Shri Sanjeev Deshpande, Addl. G.P. for respondent no.1 Shri A.Y. Kapgate, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 3 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 09.12.2016 The only prayer made by the petitioner in the instant petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Headmaster as some Headmasters from the Scheduled Castes Category have retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation. It is stated that since the petitioner was earlier working as a Headmaster and was declared surplus and since the posts are vacant, a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner would be necessary.

Shri Kapgate, the learned Counsel for the Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad, Gondia states, on instructions, vide communication, dated 7.12.2016, that the meeting for

0912wp6536.16.odt considering the claim of the petitioner for promotion is scheduled on 20.12.2016 and an appropriate decision would be taken by the said Committee.

In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondent - Zilla Parishad, the grievance of the petitioner should stand redressed. Hence, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar