Bombay High CourtWP/5551/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Savita Subhash Dorlikar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary Deptt., Mumbai And Others

2015-10-09Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

1 wp5551.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5551 OF 2015 [Savita Subhash Dorlikar .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.G. Jagtap, counsel for the petitioner, Shri D.B. Patel, AGP for the respondent nos.1 to 5. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 09, 2015.

By this petition, the petitioner challenges the action of the Collector, Yavatmal permitting the women voters of the village panchayat to give their say in respect of the functioning of FL-III licence by the petitioner in mouza Shirpur, Tahsil-Wani, District-Yavatmal. The petition is premature. The petitioner cannot seek an order restraining the Collector or the women voters from voting or giving their say for or against the liquor ship of the petitioner. If any adverse action is contemplated against the petitioner, the petitioner would be entitled to file appropriate proceedings. Since the petition is premature, we dispose of the same, with no order as to costs. The points raised in the petition are kept open.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande