Bombay High CourtCAS/954/2016ca disposed off

Gowardhan S/O Laxminarayan Dayma v. Manda Pandurang Hedaoo

2017-06-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar2 pages

1 1606cas954.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (S) NO.954 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.16636 OF 2016 GOVARDHAN S/O LAXMINARAYAN DAYAMA VS MANDA PANDURANG HEDAU - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M. I. Dhatrak, Advocate for the applicant. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATED : JUNE 16, 2017.

Considering the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in filing the second appeal stands condoned.

Civil application is allowed and disposed of. SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.16636/2016.

Issue notice to the respondent on the following substantial questions of law:

(1) In absence of any evidence being led by the defendant whether the case as pleaded by the plaintiff deserves to be accepted?

(2) The appellate Court not being satisfied with the manner in which the trial Court decided the suit, whether it ought to have remanded the same for fresh trial?

2 1606cas954.16 Notice returnable on 7-8-2017.

Hamdast.

JUDGE /MULEY/