Raju Madan Ingle v. Vinod Patil Vice Chairman, Schedule Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee Amravati And Others

0802cp337.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.337/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1336/2015 (D) Raju Madan Ingle ...Versus...

Vinod Patil, Vice Chairman, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Division, Amravati and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.P. Kalmegh, Advocate for petitioner Shri D.P. Thakare, Advocate for respondents CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : 08.02.2017 By this contempt petition, the petitioner seeks action against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the directions in the order dated 15.4.2015 in Writ Petition No.1336/2015 directing the respondents to take a decision in the caste claim of the petitioner within six months from 16.4.2015. Shri Thakare, the learned Counsel for the respondents states that due to the lack of Vigilance Officers and due to the vacancies in the Scrutiny Committee, the matter could not be decided as per the directions issued by this Court. It is stated that a decision in the caste claim of the petitioner is taken on 31.1.2017 and the caste claim of the petitioner is rejected. It is

0802cp337.16.odt stated that the delay in deciding the caste claim is not deliberate or intentional.

By accepting the statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondents, we dispose of the contempt petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar