Pandhari Dayaram Atkari v. Babita Shridhar Uikey And Others

23.wp.4833.25 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4833 of 2025 Pandhari Dayaram Atkari vs.

Babita Shridhar Uikey and others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. A.A. Dhawas, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. Kavita Bhondge, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.2 to 5.

CORAM

: PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.

DATE : 22 nd AUGUST, 2025.

Heard Mr. A.A. Dhawas, learned Counsel for the petitioner. 02.

Although, the petitioner has challenged interim order passed by respondent No.2-Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur, the learned Counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer to a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the appeal finally. 03.

Having regard to the contentions advanced, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2-Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur to decide the appeal bearing V.P.A. Appeal No.33/2025-26 (Babita Shridhar Uikey vs. Additional Collector, Bhandara and others), preferably within a period of four weeks from today.

JUDGE *sandesh