Shri Milindkumar Ukardaji Hedaoo v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Tribal Development Dept. Mumbai And Another
cp316.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.316/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.703/2008 Shri Milindkumar Ukardaji Hedaoo ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S. S. Sanyal, Advocate for petitioner.
Ms T. Udeshi, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2016 The order of which contempt is complained of is complied with. Thus, since the contempt is purged, we do not find it necessary to proceed further in the matter. The notice of contempt stands discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE kahale