← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/548/2025disposedoff

Dnyandeep S/O Motiram Lonarey v. Maha. State Power Generation Co. Ltd., Mumbai Thr. Chairman And Managing Director And ORS.

2025-08-13Hon'Ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:8002-DB 1 914-MCA No.548.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 548 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 184 OF 2024 (D) Shri Dnyandeep S/o. Motiram Lonarey ..VS..

Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Ltd., Mumbai through its Chairman and Managing Director and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. D. U. Thakare, Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner. Dr. Collin C. Anthony, Advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM : SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, AND PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : 13 th AUGUST, 1.

Heard.

2.

The present application is filed for restoration of Writ Petition No. 184/2024. The said writ petition was dismissed in default on 29/07/2025 on the ground that the Petitioner did not turn up in spite of direction to appraise the Court about status of his pensionary benefits. The reason given for non appearance is the no objection was granted by earlier Counsel, however, Vakalatnama remained to be filed in the Petition and, therefore, the Counsel engaged subsequently was absent.

2 914-MCA No.548.2025 3.

The learned Counsel for the Respondent vehemently opposed the Application on the ground that there is no reason to restore the writ petition.

4.

Considering the reasons, the application needs to be allowed subject to costs of Rs.2000/- as no due diligence is shown. Accordingly, we pass the following order : (i) The Application is allowed subject to costs of Rs.2,000/- (Rs. Two Thousand only). The costs to be paid to the Respondents within a period of two weeks. (ii) The Registry is directed to restore the Writ Petition on its original number after payment of costs.

The Miscellaneous Civil Application stands disposed of.

(PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.) (SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) Kirtak