← Library
Bombay High CourtSA/546/2015dismissedrule discharged

Venudas S/O Atmaram Bhoyar And Others v. Sau. Kantabai Purushottam Bhoyar

2017-01-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande2 pages

1901sa546.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Second Appeal No.546 of 2015 (Venudas s/o Atmaram Bhoyar and others v. Kantabai Puroshottam Bhoyar) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri N.S. Khandewale, Advocate for Appellants. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J.

Date : 19 th January, 2017 The Trial Court dismissed the claim for specific performance of contract dated 24-4-1993 at Exhibit 56, but passed a decree for refund of earnest money of Rs.13,950/- received by the defendants along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The lower Appellate Court has passed a decree against the defendant Nos.1 to 3, who are directed to execute the sale-deed upon receipt of balance consideration of Rs.2,850/- in respect of their undivided share in the suit property. The claim of the plaintiff for specific performance of contract against the respondent No.4 has been rejected.

Shri Khandewale, the learned counsel for the appellant-defendants, has argued that the readiness and willingness has not been established. The lower Appellate Court has held that the substantial amount of consideration was paid. The sale-deed was to be executed as per the agreement

1901sa546.15.odt dated 24-4-1993 in the year 2001. Accordingly, the notice was issued on 6-12-2001 calling upon the defendants to execute the sale-deed by paying the balance amount of consideration of Rs.2,850/-.

In view of this, no substantial question of law arises for consideration. The second appeal is dismissed. Judge.

Lanjewar