← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/397/2020ca disposed off

Latabai Wd/O Gendalal Yelane And Others v. Narendra Pal S/O Bhupendra Singh Alag And Another

2024-10-22Registrar (Judicial)1 pages

1 29.caf.397.2020

IN THE HIGH

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 397 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.17981 OF 2019 Latabai wd/o Gendlal Yelane and ors.

..vs..

Narendra Pal s/o Bhupendra Singh Alag and anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mrs. Rohini Mankar, Advocate h/f Shri Mirache, Advocate for the applicant.

Mrs. Anita Mategoankar, Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM: PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.

DATED : 26/09/2025.

Heard.

2.

By this application, the applicant, who are the original claimants seeking condonation of 113 days delay in filing the appeal.

3.

It is stated by the applicant that due to death of bread earner of the family, they were facing financial crisis, and therefore, could not file the appeal immediately after the judgment of the Tribunal. 4.

Learned Counsel for the respondents strongly opposed the application stating that no sufficient reasons stated in the application to condone the delay. 4.

However, looking to the averment made in the application which according to me are sufficient to condone the delay, hence, application is allowed. Delay stands condoned.

5.

Office is directed to restore the appeal and list the same as per its turn.

(PRAVIN S. PATIL , J.

) Signed by: Trupti D. Agrawal Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 29/09/2025 10:54:08 Trupti