← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5804/2014dismissedrule discharged

Milind S/O Shankarrao Nichal And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Rural Development, Mumbai And Others

2015-03-23Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar2 pages

23.03.wp.5804.14.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITIION NO, 5804 /2014 (Shri Milind s/o Shankarraio Nichal and another vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ) .......................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. V.G. Bhamburkar, Adv. for petitioners Mr. K.L.Dharmadhikari, A.G.P. for respondents 1 to 4 Respondent no.5 served.

CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK & A.M.BADAR, JJ.

DATED : 23rd March, 2015.

Heard.

By this petition, the petitioners challenge the action of the respondents in reserving one seat in favour of Scheduled Tribes (woman) category.

According to the petitioners who claim to be the voters in the Gram Panchayat, Kalgawhan, one seat in Ward No.1 could not have been reserved in favour of Scheduled Tribes (woman). It is stated that as per the report of the Patwari, there were only three persons belonging to Scheduled Tribes in the village; whereas in Ward No.1 there is only one voter in the S.T. Category. We however find, on a reading of the Writ Petition and the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the

23.03.wp.5804.14.

respondents, that according to the report which is relied on, while granting reservation for S.T. (woman), the Scheduled Tribes population of 113, and the total population of the village of 1408 was considered. We do not find any reason to interfere with the decision of reserving one seat for S.T.(woman) by making a reference to the contradictory report, which is subsequently furnished by the Patwari.

In the result, the Writ Petition fails and is dismissed, with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE sahare