Narendras/O Gopalrao Nadge v. The Schedule Tribe, Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Division, Amravati, Thr. Its Secretary

1010caw2789.17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application (CAW) No.2789 of 2017 In Writ Petition No.1933 of 2017 Narendra s/o Gulabrao Nadge v.

The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, through its Member-Secretary, Amravati.

Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Ms Sejal Lakhani, Advocate for Applicant-Petitioner. Coram : R.K. Deshpande & Arun D. Upadhye, JJ. Dated : 10 th October, 2018 Ms Sejal Lakhani, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant-petitioner, has vehemently argued that at the time of filing of this petition, there was no apprehension about the termination of the services of the petitioner. Hence, the employer was not joined as the party-respondent. Now the apprehension is apparent and, therefore, this application is moved.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today.

1010caw2789.17.odt After carrying out the amendment, issue notice to the added-respondent, returnable on 5-12-2018.

(Arun D. Upadhye, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.) Lanjewar Prashant Dewaji Lanjewar Prashant Dewaji Lanjewar Date: 2018.10.11 11:01:39 +0530