Ramesh S/O Babarao Kale And Others v. The Collector Yavatmal And Others

wp8202.22.O.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT B

O MBAY NAGP U R BENCH, N A GPUR WRIT PETITION NO.

.

(Ramesh s/o Babarao Kale and others Vs. The Collector, Yavatmal and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. J. B. Kasat, Advocate for Petitioners.

Ms. T. H. Khan, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 6/State. CORAM: PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN AND URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE , J J.

DATE: 6 th OCTOBER, .

The learned counsel for the petitioners in para 16 of the writ petition stated on solemn affirmation that the petitioners have neither moved this Hon'ble Court nor the Supreme Court in respect of the subject matter. The learned counsel, even while making the submission did not address the said issue.

It is only after the learned AGP has pointed out that this Court had already dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners on 24.01.2018 (Writ Petition No.5494/2017), the learned counsel now submits that it was due to inadvertence which cannot be accepted.

It tantamounts to suppression of material fact on record, and therefore, an equitable relief cannot be granted under writ jurisdiction.

The petition stands dismissed. No costs.

(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) NSN