Dr. Khushal S/O Tukaramji Mele, And 2 Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary, Depart. Of Higher And Techinical Education And 5 Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.7008/2015 Dr. Khushal s/o Tukaramji Mele and others ...Versus...

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Higher and Technical Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioners Shri P.S. Tembhare, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 4 Shri P.B. Patil, Advocate for respondent no.5 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : 01.02.2016 Heard.

Shri Tembhare, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos.1 to 4 and Shri Patil, the learned Counsel for the respondent no.5 state that the issue involved in this case stands answered against the petitioners by the judgment rendered at the Principal Seat of the Bombay High Court. It is stated that in view of the decision in almost identical matters, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

Shri Kulkarni, the learned Counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the statement made on behalf of the respondents. In view of the aforesaid, we dismiss the writ petition for the reasons recorded in the judgment dated 23.12.2015 in Writ Petition No.6009/2015. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar