Bombay High CourtWP/5689/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Mousam S/O Tarachand Deshmukh v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Seceretary, Depart Of Education Mumbai And 3 Others

2015-12-22Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale1 pages

WP5689-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5689/2015 (MOUSAM TARACHAND DESHMUKH VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.H. Chandurkar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.K. Pathan, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 2.

Shri P.B. Patil, counsel for the R-4.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 22 , 2015.

Shri Chandurkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that cause of filing the writ petition would not survive as the Caste Scrutiny Committee has verified the caste claim of the petitioner.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE