Bombay High CourtWP/5679/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Nikhil S/O Late Banduji Mahajan, And Another v. State Of Maharashtra,Thr.Secretary,Depart Of Food,Civil Supplies And Consumer Protecton, And Anothe

2015-10-12Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

WP5679-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5679/2015 (NIKHIL BANDUJI MAHAJAN & ANOTHER VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.M. Puranik, counsel for the petitioner. Shri D.M. Kale, A.G.P. for the respondents.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 12 , 2015.

Heard.

The only prayer made by the petitioners is for a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the revision filed by the petitioners in the month of June-2015. It is stated that it would be necessary for the respondent no.2 to decide the revision within a reasonable time.

Shri Kale, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, states that if the revision is pending, the same would be decided by the respondent no.2 as early as possible and within a period of two months from the date of service of the notice of the revision on the concerned parties. By accepting the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, which would be binding on the respondent no.2, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE