Gajanan S/O Vishwanath Kakade v. State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Pimpalgaon Raja Tq.Khamgaon Dist.Buldhana

1 apeal 203.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Criminal Appeal No.

of 20 [Gajanan S/o Vishwanath Kakade (in jail) ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O., P.S., Pimpalgaon Raja, Tq. Khamgaon, Distt. Buldana] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms. Preeti D. Rane, Advocate for the appellant (appointed) Mr. M. K. Pathan, APP for the State/respondent CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO AND ANIL L. PANSARE J J .

DATED : 20 - 9It is common ground that even before learned counsel, Ms. Rane was appointed by the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur to represent the appellant and a separate appeal was preferred by the appellant which is partly allowed and disposed of. 2.

The present appeal is, therefore, disposed of. 3.

The fees of the learned appointed counsel be quantified and paid in accordance with the rules. (Anil L. Pansare, J.) (Rohit B. Deo, J.) wasnik YUVRAJ WASNIK