Bombay High CourtWP/5641/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Shankar S/O Hardeoram Vishwakarma v. Mahagenco, Mumbai Through Managing Director And Another

2015-06-08Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice C.V. Bhadang2 pages

0806wp5641.14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5641/2014 Shankar s/o Hardeoram Vishwakarma ...Versus...

MAHAGENCO, through Managing Director, Mumbai and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.M. Sudame, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for respondents CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ.

DATE : 08.06.2015 By this petition, the petitioner has sought a direction to the respondents to transfer the petitioner from Paras Thermal Project to Koradi, Khaperkheda Thermal Projects or to Nagpur Coal Office. The petitioner has challenged the order transferring the petitioner from Mumbai to Paras Thermal Project. Shri Sudame, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner gives up the prayer challenging the order transferring the petitioner to Paras Thermal Power Station and the grievance of the petitioner would stand redressed, if this Court directs the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 4.9.2014 for transfer of the petitioner to either of the three places mentioned hereinabove for the reasons stated in the representation. It is stated that though the representation was made before filing of the petition, the same is not yet decided.

0806wp5641.14.odt Shri Mohgaonkar, the learned Counsel for the respondents states that if the representation of the petitioner is not yet decided, the same would be decided as early as possible and positively within a period of four weeks. By accepting the statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondents, which would be binding on the respondents, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar