Bombay High CourtCRA/115/2018dispossed offdismiss for default

Sau. Radhabai W/O Arjun Salunke v. Suresh S/O Motiramji Bhati

2019-09-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 12.cra115.2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH NAGPUR CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.115/2018 Sau Radhabai W/o. Arjun Salunke ..VS..

Suresh S/o. Motiramji Bhati - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri V. S. Mishra, Advocate for the applicant Shri P. K. Mishra, Advocate for the non-applicant CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : 11 th September 2019 Heard.

2] Shri P. K. Mishra, learned Advocate for the non-applicant states that the plaintiff in civil suit has filed an application before trial Court seeking permission to withdraw the civil suit and therefore, the challenge to the interlocutory order passed by the trial Court on the application (Exh.16) does not survive.

3] Accepting the above submission, the civil revision application is disposed as infructuous. In the circumstances, parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGE Namrata