← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7924/2018disposedoff

Vandana @ Lekhavati W/O Eknath Birkhede (Maiden Name Vandana @ Lekhavati D/O Rao Lokendra Singh) v. Eknath @ Balraj S/O Tularamji Birkhede

2019-07-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

WP7924-18 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 7924/2018 (VANDANA ALIAS LEKHAVATI EKNATH BIRKHEDE VERSUS EKNATH ALIAS BALRAJ TULARAMJI BIRKHEDE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.S. Shahane, counsel for petitioner.

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATE : JULY , 2019.

Shri S.S. Shahane, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not responding to the communications issued for imparting necessary instructions. According to him, it is likely that the disputes between the parties have settled. The Writ Petition is therefore disposed of for want of prosecution on account of absence of instructions. JUDGE APTE