← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/2081/2021disposed off

Ganesh Shrikisan Khandelwal v. Ashok S/O Prahlad Agrawal And Others

2022-01-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo1 pages

1 caw 2081.2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Civil Application (CAW) No. 2081 of 2021 in Writ Petition No. 3992 of 2021 (D) [Dr. Ganesh Shrikisan Khandelwal ..vs.. Ashok Prahlad Agrawal and anr.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A. P. Thakare, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner Mr. V. K. Paliwal, Advocate for respondent 1 Ms. T. H. Khan, A. G. P. for the State/respondent 3 CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATED : 4 -1-202 This application, which is styled as an application for clarification of the order dated 11/10/2021, is treated as an application for speaking to minutes. 2.

While remanding the matter to the appellate authority, inadvertently, it is recorded in paragraph 7 of the order dated 11/10/2021 that the petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

3.

The reference ought to have been only to prayer clause (a) which is the appellate order. The order dated 11/10/2021 be corrected appropriately and the words prayer clause (b) in the order be deleted.

4.

The application is disposed of.

JUDGE wasnik YUVRAJ WASNIK