Bombay High CourtCAW/2067/2015rejected at admission stage

Satishkumar Hardayal Pashine. v. Western Coalfields Ltd. And Throgh Its Managing Director And 2 Others.

2015-11-16Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale1 pages

WP2289-98 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W. NO.2067/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2289/1998 (SATISHKUMAR HARDAYAL PASHINE VERSUS W.C.L. & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Petitioner in Person.

Shri A.S. Mehadia, counsel for the R-1.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 16 , 2015.

Heard.

The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 strongly opposes the prayer made in the application. It is stated that the proposed amendment changes the nature of the petition. The objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 is upheld. We find on a reading of the prayer clauses that the proposed amendment changes the nature of the writ petition. The prayer made in the civil application is rejected. The civil application is disposed of accordingly. The applicant is free to take up appropriate proceedings for seeking the relief.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE