← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5505/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Sau. Asha Ashok Karlewar v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Education Mumbai And Another

2016-12-09Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

WP5505-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5505/2016 (ASHA ASHOK KARLEWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri J.M. Shamkuwar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.A. Madiwale, A.G.P. for the R-1.

Mrs. I.L. Bodade and Shri G.G. Mishra, counsel for the R-2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 9 , 2016.

The learned counsel for the respondent-Zilla Parishad states on instructions that the question whether the petitioner could be declared surplus would be re-examined by the education officer as the information was incomplete. In view of the said statement, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.

Hence, by accepting the statement made by the learned counsel for the Zilla Parishad, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE