Bombay High CourtCAW/295/2013admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Vinayak Ramdas Tayde v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Co-Operation, Marketing And Textile Department And 2 Oth.

2015-04-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre1 pages

1 caw295.13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 295 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3972 OF 2012.

(VINAYAK RAMDAS TAYDE..VS..STATE OF MAH. & 2 OTH) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.U.J.Deshpande, Advocate for Petitioner.

CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND S.B.SHUKRE, JJ.

DATED : APRIL 22, 2015.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection if the civil application is allowed. As the present writ petition and Writ Petition No. 2563 of 2010 are to be heard together, we allow this application.

Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks.

Since the dispute pertains to seniority list, liberty to move for fixed date hearing after vacations. JUDGE JUDGE RRaut..