Suraj Ramdasji Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Ps,Kalmeshwar, Dist. Nagpur
2025:BHC-NAG:13600 1 / 3 15-aba 599-25
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION(ABA) NO. 599 OF 2025 Suraj Ramdasji Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and Registrar's orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.P.S.Tidke,counsel for the applicant.
Mr.N.R.Rode,APP for the State.
CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 05/12/2025
1. Apprehending the arrest at the hands of connection with Crime No.583/2025, police in registered with Police Station Kalmeshwar, District Nagpur for the offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, the applicant approached this Court for grant of prearrest bail. 2.
Heard learned Counsel for the applicant, who submitted that crime is registered on the basis of a report lodged by Shubham @ Manish Diliprao Zade on an allegation that the present applicant had obtained money from him, issued him a cheque, the cheque is dishonoured and thereafter, he was abused by the present applicant when
2 / 3 15-aba 599-25 the amount was demanded. It is further alleged that the amount was obtained for investing it in the share market and the complainant was duped. He invited my attention towards some agreement, which shows that there was a hand loan transaction between the present applicant and the informant and out of that hand loan transaction, the FIR came to be lodged.
3.
Learned APP strongly opposed for the same and submitted that there are various investors coming forward alleging the similar allegations against the present applicant. It reveals that the present applicant's modus operandi to obtain the amount as a hand loan and thereafter, obtain the amount on the pretext of investing in the share market. Thus, considering the fact that various persons were duped. In view of that, the prayer for grant of ad-interim protection deserves to be rejected.
4.
On hearing both sides and on perusal of the recitals of the FIR and the documents filed on record, at this stage, it reveals that it was a hand loan transaction. Admittedly, whether the amount was obtained besides this hand loan transaction for investing in the share market is a matter of investigation. The applicant is attending the police station and cooperating with the police machinery. At this stage, the applicant has made out a case for grant of
3 / 3 15-aba 599-25 anticipatory bail. The learned APP has conceded for the same. As the aplicant is attedning the police station and he is co-operating with the police machinery the ad-interim protection gratned on 13/08/2025 needs to confirmed. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following order: .
i] The application is allowed.
ii] The order dated 13.08.2025 granting ad-interim anticipatory bail is confirmed.
iii] The applicant to attend the Police Station till filing of the charge-sheet.
iv] The application stands disposed of.
JUDGE