← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5617/2024disposed off as a withdrawn

Union Bank Of India, Nagpur Thr. Bank Authorized Officer, Mr. Rohit Pradeep Gulkari v. State Of Maha., Thr. Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance And Revenue, Mumbai And ORS.

2024-09-25Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish Dangre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri2 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:10693-DB 1 904-wp 5617.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5617 OF 2024 ( Union Bank of India vs. State of Maharashtra and others ) Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.

Mr.S.D.Ingole, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.D.V.Chavan,Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI , JJ.

ATE : SEPTEMBER 25 , 2024 In the wake of the fact that the petitioner Bank has registered its security interest under the provisions of Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act, 2002), in the year 2017 itself and it has also initiated proceedings under the SARFAESI Act resulting into an order passed under Section 14 of the said Act by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandrapur dated 23/09/2022.

2) The petitioner Bank has also taken possession of the subject property as per the provisions of 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and has put the property on E-auction sale. The respondent No.4 has filed an appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal by way of S.A.No.96/2019 and the same is pending for adjudication. Similarly, the Bank has also filed proceedings under Section 19(1) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act,1993 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal by filing O.A. No.103/2020. 3) In the wake of aforesaid discussion since we expressed our disinclination to entertain the petition seeking

2 904-wp 5617.2024.odt interference in the order of attachment and recording of encumbrances over the secured interest of the petitioner Bank, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to take appropriate steps before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

4) The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. ( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) ( BHARATI DANGRE, J. ) KOLHE