Ganesh Domaji Nitnaware v. Sukeshini W/O Ganesh Nitnaware

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION O. NO.1661/2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.24/2015 Ganesh Domaji Nitnaware ...Versus...

Sukeshini w/o Ganesh Nitnaware - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms Kajal Funde, Adv. h/f Shri A.M. Ghare, Adv. for appellant Shri R.R. Prajapati, Advocate for respondent CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : 01.10.2016 The matter does not pertain to a decree of divorce and pertains only to the grant of lump sum maintenance. The family Court had directed the appellant to pay lump sum maintenance of Rs.4,00,000/- to the respondent. We have admitted the appeal and have directed the appellant to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- to the respondent every month during the pendency of this appeal. If an amount of Rs.4,00,000/- is deposited in the fixed deposit, the respondent would have received a sum of Rs.4,000/- per month only. Hence, we are not inclined to hear the matter by fixed date, when several matrimonial matters of young couples, seeking a decree of divorce are pending. The civil application stands rejected.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar

C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.

Uploaded by : S.S. Wadkar, P.S. Uploaded on : 03/10/2016