← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/826/2017others disposed off

Shri. Rajdeep S/O. Mohanji Gedam (In Jail) v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Deputy Inspector General Of Prison, Nagpur And Another

2017-09-11Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Murlidhar Ganpatrao Giratkar1 pages

WP826-17 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 826/2017 (RAJDEEP MOHANJI GEDAM (IN JAIL) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, DIG OF PRISON, NAGPUR & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.P. Meshram, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.M. Joshi, A.P.P. for the respondents.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND M.G. GIRATKAR, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2017.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents states that by the judgment in the criminal appeal, the matter was remanded to the trial Court, with the result, the petitioner would be an undertrial. It is stated that parole and furlough leave would not be applicable to the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid statements, we dispose of the criminal writ petition with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE