← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5422/2021dismissed for nonprosecutiondefault

Karan Agency Yavatmal Thr. Proprietor, Ashok Ramrao Bijewar v. Maharashtra Zilla Pradhikaran Yavatmal Division, Yavtmal Thr. Executive Engineer And Others

2025-05-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi1 pages

1 546.wp.5422.21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5422/2021 Karan Agency Vs.

The Maharashtra Jeevan Padhikaran, Yavatmal Division, Yavatmal and Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S. S. Ghate, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. N. S. Autkar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.3/State. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 07/05/2025.

1.

In spite of the objections being notified and sufficient chances being granted, the objections are not removed.

2.

As such, by way of last chance, we grant time of six weeks to remove office objections.

3.

Failure to remove office objections will entail the dismissal of the petition without further reference to the Court.

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule