Ballabhdas Udhodas Mohta v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle-5, Nagpur
CAO1932-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. NO.1932/2016 IN M.C.A.. ST. NO. 19634/2016 (BALLABHDAS UDHODAS MOHTA VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NAGPUR) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.S. Bhattad, counsel for the applicant. Shri A. Parchure, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 16 , 2017.
Heard.
Though the learned counsel for the department opposes the prayer, for the reasons stated in the application, the prayer is granted and the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned.
The civil application is allowed and disposed of. M.C.A. ST. NO.19634/2016.
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, the prayer is granted subject to the payment of deficit court fees within two weeks and payment of Rupees Five Hundred to the High Court Bar Association, Nagpur within one week. The miscellaneous civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE APTE