Mrs. Rumana Seikh Naved And Another v. Sheikh Naved Seikh Sikander

1 appr156.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO.156 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.8 OF 2015 (Mrs. Rumana Sheikh Naved and another ..vs.. Sheikh Naved Sheikh Sikander) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATED : 11-02-2016 Heard Ms. U.R. Tanna, learned Advocate for the applicants. None appears for the non-applicant. 2.

By this application, the applicants prayed that the non-applicant be directed to deposit the amount of Rs.3,000/- per month towards maintenance granted to the applicant No.2 (minor daughter) in the savings bank account of the applicant No.1. The claim of the applicant No.1 for grant of maintenance has been rejected by the Family Court. On query, the learned Advocate for the applicant states that the applicant No.1 is presently employed as Teacher.

3.

In the above facts, in my view, it would not be appropriate to consider the prayer made by the applicants in this application and the applicants can avail appropriate remedy according to law.

2 appr156.15 4.

The application is dismissed with liberty to the applicants as recorded above.

JUDGE pma