Nitin Vaijinath Shahane v. Sau. Shamal Nitin Shahane And Another

apl639.14 32

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.639 OF 2014 Nitin Vaijinath Shahane ..vs..

Sau. Shamal Nitin Shahane and anr ....................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ....................................................................................................................................................... None for the applicant.

Shri A.K. Bhangde, counsel for the non-applicants. CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATED : JUNE 20, 2017.

When this matter was called out on 19.10.2015, learned counsel for the applicant was absent and learned counsel for the non-applicant was present. Order sheets show that on every occasion, learned counsel for the applicant was absent, except on 25.4.207 the matter was adjourned by consent.

Today, when the matter was called out in the morning, learned counsel for the applicant was absent and learned counsel for the nonapplicant was present. When the matter is called out on second occasion, learned counsel for the applicant is absent.

.....2/-

apl639.14 32 Hence, the criminal application is dismissed in default.

JUDGE !! BRW !!

...../-