← Library
Bombay High CourtEP/9/2009dispossed offdismiss for default

Baldeo S/O Sukhdeo Palaspagar v. Harish Marotiappa Pimple

2015-10-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale1 pages

1 e.p.9.09.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

Election Petition No. 9 of 2009 (Baldeo S/o Sukhdeo Palaspagar Vs. Harish Marotiappa Pimple) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders Shri Sharad Thakre, Advocate h/f Shri Bhutada, Advocate for petitioner CORAM : P. B. Varale, J.

DATE : 9-10-2015.

Learned counsel Shri Thakre appearing on behalf of Shri Bhutada, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition was filed in the year 2009 challenging the election of the returned candidate in view of the result declared on 22-10-2009 and by the passage of time, the petition has become infructuous.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, petition is disposed of. JUDGE wasnik ...../-