← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6206/2013dispossed offdismiss for default

Sachin Prakash Paralkar v. Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Washim And 3 Others

2015-07-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain2 pages

1 17.07.wp.6206.13.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6206 /2013 ( Sachin Prakash Paralkar vs. Education Officer (Sec) Z.P.Washim and others ) .......................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. P.S.Patil, Adv. for petitioner/s Mr. Mr. N S Rao, AGP for respondents 1 and 2 Mr. Amol Deshpande, Adv.for respondents 3 and 4 CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & INDIRA K.JAIN, JJ.

DATED : 17th July, 2015.

Heard.

Perusal of the material placed on record would reveal that bills were submitted by the Headmaster of the respondent no. 4-School to respondent nos.1 and 2. However, it was sent back to respondent no. 4 since, according to respondent nos. 2 and 3, the same was to be submitted after making pay fixation in accordance with VI Pay Commission.

Shri Amol Deshpande, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 4 submitted that the pay fixation cannot be done by the said respondents. It has to be done by respondent nos. 1 and 2.

The Government Resolutions clearly show

2 17.07.wp.6206.13. as to what salary shall be paid to various types of teachers as per the VI Pay Commission. As such, there should be no difficulty for the respondent nos.3 and 4 to do the calculations on the basis of the relevant Government Resolutions. In that view of the matter, the respondent nos.3 and 4 shall re-submit the bill within a period of two weeks from today.

After receipt thereof, the respondent nos.1 and 2 shall take a decision in accordance with law and do the needful, within a period of four weeks thereafter.

In view of the aforesaid directions, Writ Petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE sahare