Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao Amale v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Principal Secretary Higher And Technical Education And 4 Others

1003caw599.16.odt 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 599 OF 2016 IN/AND WRIT PETITION NO. 1787 OF 2015 (Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao Amle Vs. The State of Maharashtra & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri F. T. Mirza, Advocate for the petitioner/applicant. A.G.P. for the respondents-State.

Shri A. B. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.5. CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATED : 10 MARCH, 2016 Learned A.G.P. seeking time to file reply. However, we find that subsequent events are sought to be brought on record. The petition is yet to be admitted. In this situation, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respondents in the matter, we allow the application.

Necessary amendments be carried out within one week.

Liberty to the respondents to file their replies, if any, within further period of two weeks.

Place the writ petition for consideration after three weeks.

JUDGE JUDGE wwl