← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/2093/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Suman Wd/O Gajanan Parad v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Dept. Of Women And Child Development,Mumbai And Or

2015-10-13Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

1 caw2093.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CAW NO.2093/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4027/2015 [D] [Suman wd/o Gajanan Parad .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Shri Agrawal, counsel for the applicant, Ms. N.P. Mehta, AGP for the respondent nos.1 to 3 and 5, Shri S.M. Ukey, counsel for the respondent nos.4 and 6, Shri Vishwadeep Mate, counsel h/f Shri A.B. Moon, counsel for the respondent nos.7 and 8.

..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATED : OCTOBER 13, 2015.

Heard.

There is no question of extension of time for the appearance of the petitioner - present applicant before the respondent no.2. The learned counsel for the applicant had undertaken on behalf of the applicant on 6.10.2015 that she would remain present before the respondent no.2 on 19.10.2015. There cannot be any extension of time in a case where the undertaking was given by the applicant. The applicant may take other appropriate steps for seeking the extension of time for decision in the matter. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande