Bombay High CourtCAO/130/2013admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Usha Wd/O Ashok Jejani And 3 Other v. Papoathi P W/O Palaniappan And Another

2015-01-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq2 pages

1 cao130.13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. NO.130/2013 IN M.C.A. STAMP NO.19935/2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.749/2012 Usha Wd/o Ashok Jejani and others ..Versus..

Papoathi P W/o Palaniappan and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 6.1.2015 Heard Ms. M.H. Pathade, advocate h/f Shri P.S. Mirache, advocate for the applicants. None for the non-applicants, though served.

For the reasons stated in the application and the fact that it is not opposed by the non-applicants inasmuch as reply is not filed, the civil application is allowed.

2 cao130.13 M.C.A. STAMP NO.19935/2012 For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed. The First Appeal Stamp No.10528/2012 is restored on condition that the appellant shall remove the office objections as were pointed out by the office till 16 th January, 2015, failing which this order shall stand recalled and the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to Court. JUDGE Tambaskar.