Bombay High CourtCAO/1702/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Wasudeo Sitaramji Mahalle And Another v. Gajanan Laxmnarao Peche And 2 Others

2016-10-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain2 pages

CPL2-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT APPEAL NO.2/2016 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 79/2015 (WASUDEO SITARAMJI MAHALLE & ANOTHER VERSUS GAJANAN LAXMANRAO PECHE & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the applicant/respondent no.1.

Shri S.M. Vaishnav, counsel for the appellants. Shri P.S. Tembhare, A.G.P. for the R-2 & 3.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 05 , 2016.

C.A.O. NO. 1702/2016.

None for the applicant.

The contempt appeal is admitted. No ground is made out for granting an out of turn hearing. The question in regard to the maintainability of the appeal could be raised at the time of final hearing. Even before admitting the appeal, the point was raised on behalf of the applicant. The civil application stands disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE

CPL2-16 CERTIFICATE I certify that this Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order.

Uploaded by: Rohit D. Apte.

Uploaded on :06.10.2016.