← Library
Bombay High CourtAPL/685/2016other disposed off

Nitin S/O Ramdas Deulkar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. Nandgaon Khandeshwar Police Station, Amravati And Another

2016-09-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.685 OF 2016 Nitin S/o Ramdas Deulkar and ors ..vs..

The State of Maharashtra, through its Police Station Officer, Nandgaon Khandeshwar Police Station, District Amravati and anr AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.674 OF 2013 Ramdas Deulkar and anr ..vs..

The State of Maharashtra, through its Police Station Officer, Nandgaon Khandeshwar Police Station, District Amravati and anr ....................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ....................................................................................................................................................... APL NO.685/2016 Shri Sumit Joshi, counsel for the applicants. Ms Nisha Ramteke, counsel for non-applicant No.2. Shri M.J. Khan, Addl.P.P. for non-applicant No.1. APL NO.674/2013 Shri Sumit Joshi, cousnel for the applicants. Shri M.J. Khan, Addl.P.P.for non-applicant No.1.

CORAM

: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 28, 2016.

Heard.

The FIR under Section 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code is questioned by inlaws in Criminal Application No.674 of 2013. In-laws and husband Nitin have approached in Criminal Application No.685 of 2016 for quashing of FIR as issue is amicably settled and non-applicant No.2 Archana, in .....2/-

both the matters, is residing with her husband Nitin at Nandgaon Khandeshwar.

Archana present in Court with her Advocate states that she is residing at in-laws with her husband and FIR should be quashed and set aside. Nitin present in Court also accepts this. The later proceedings below prayer clause 1 shows signatures of all parties with their respective counsel.

In view of this position and joint request, prayer is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (1) in Criminal Application No.685 of 2016. Consequently, both the proceedings are disposed of.

In view of disposal of the main criminal applications, the criminal application, if any, is also disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE !! BRW !!

.....3/-

C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that this Order/Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order.

Uploaded by : Bhushan R.Wankhede.

Uploaded on :- 29/09/2016 (Personal Assistant) ...../-