← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1368/2014dismissedrule discharged

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Through Its Executive Engineer, Nagpur v. Hiralal S/O Gulabdeo Bhaiswar And Others

2018-09-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 cao1368.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAO NO. 1368/2014 IN CAF NO. 952/2013 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1001/2013 VIDC ..VS..

Hiralal S/o Gulabrao Bhaiswar & ors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri J.J. Chandurkar, Advocate for the applicant/appellant Shri H.D. Dubey, AGP for the non-applicant/respondent nos. 2 & 3 CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : 04/09/ By this application, the non-applicant no. 1/claimant has prayed that the order passed by this Court on 02/09/2013 be recalled. By the order dated 02/09/2013, this Court permitted the claimant to withdraw 50% of the amount deposited by the applicant/appellant. In the civil application, it is stated that the claimant requires additional amount as he intended to purchase the agricultural land. The application is pending since 08/10/2014. The claimant has not shown due diligence in pursuing the matter and it creates a doubt about the genuineness of the need of the claimant. The civil application is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Ansari