← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5849/2016disposedoff

Maa Tuljabhavani Bhujalashayin Matsyavyavsay Sah. Sanstha Mary. Thr. President, Mangrulpir, Washim v. The Deputy Registrar, Co-Op. Society, Add. Commissioner Of Fisheries, Maha. State, Mumbai And Other

2019-06-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi2 pages

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5849/2016 (Maa Tuljabhavani Bhujalashayin Matsyayavshay Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit,Jogaldari vs. The Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Society, Mumbai and 4 others ) ................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. Shri S. S.Khadse, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.P.Deshpande, Addl.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 3 CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 18th June, 2019.

Heard learned counsel appearing for respective parties. 2.

The notice issued by this Court on 5th October, 2016 is served upon all the respondents, including respondent no.4 -Dongarkhed Matsyavyavsaik and Zinga Uptadan Sahakari Sanstha, Maryadit; however no one appears for respondent nos. 4 and 5. Shri S.p. Deshpande, learned Additional G.P. appears for respondent nos.1 to 3. 3.

On instructions, the learned Addl.G.P. makes a statement that allotment of Chandai Tank for fishing purposes has already been cancelled. Hence, the grievance of the petitioner in respect of allotment of Tank to respondent no.4 does not survive.

4.

The petitioners claim to be the individuals engaged in fishing and have lost their land in submerged area of the Tank in question. All such persons who were engaged in the job of fishing have

constituted the petitioner-society and for its registration a proposal was submitted to respondent no.2. The proposal was returned on 7th December, 2015 on the ground that fishing rights were not secured by the respondents. Now the fishing rights having been secured by the respondents, the process of allotment of Tank will have to be carried out afresh and the respondents are, therefore, directed to decide the claim of the petitioner for registration of Society before the allotment process commences. The Writ Petition, therefore, stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE sahare